Tribute to Harold Schweitzer
Madison School
1953-1958
All too often, we go through school without giving much thought to those who taught us. There is a good reason for this. We’re just kids, and we know that kids are simply not designed to muse over the qualities of their teachers. They can tell the good ones from the bad, but that’s about it. However, one of the luxuries of ‘getting along’ in years is that one can look back on this life and recall people and events that truly had an impact.
As adults, we tend to remember friends, family, and bosses who may have guided us or helped shape our world view and self esteem, but we often overlook those who gave us our first contact with authority figures other than our parents.
In the past two years, we have been developing our Madison School website, and it has been interesting to get feedback not only from our alumni, but also from folks who have said, “You know, I can’t remember a single teacher I had in elementary school”. Or there were others who can only recall teachers who made their lives miserable.
We think that there was something very special about the teachers and their impact on our experience as Madison students, especially (but not limited to) the early years after the school opened in 1953. Mr. Harold Schweitzer was both literally and figuratively a giant in the minds of many of us. He combined a love of learning and teaching with a genuine joy at being around young people.
If you were a student of Harold Schweitzer, we hope you will take a few moments to think back to the days at Madison and contribute your memories of how special he was. We are lucky to have his great buddy and co-teacher, Anthony Palisi, contribute his memories, along with a biographical sketch that reveal the unique talents and rare qualities that this teacher had. When we see his professional path after Madison, we can’t help but be impressed and thankful that he got his ‘start’ with us at Madison.
We were a lucky group, those of us who ‘opened’ Madison in 1953. The energy and commitment of the teachers and staff, while not unique, were a rare combination. Not only were our teachers supportive and enthused, but they were also quite sophisticated and intelligent…. And we were the beneficiaries!
We have included several Tributes here, but we would also like to add any submissions as they are sent in. Just send it in Word to Madison.rahway@gmail.com to be included in the Tribute to our Mr. Harold Schweitzer.
**********************************************
Reminiscences by Anthony Palisi Rahway roots ran deep in the family of Harold Schweitzer, whose 848 Westfield Avenue residence was centrally located between the two public schools which he attended: Franklin Elementary and Rahway High. Upon graduation, he matriculated to Newark College of Engineering before entering the US Army. While in the military, he contracted rheumatic fever, and when his life seemed in jeopardy, his parents Fire Captain Harold and Mrs. Mary Schweitzer, successfully petitioned to have him discharged and sent home, either to die or to recuperate. Eventually, he recovered, but the illness left his heart severely damaged, curtailing his physical activity. Having recovered sufficiently to resume a relatively normal life, Harold transferred to Seton Hall College in South Orange, where he changed his major to social studies, a department chaired by one of the college’s most demanding professors. Even those whose major concentration was other than social studies quaked at the name of Rev. Dr. Joseph Brady—and a good portion of student body then was comprised of returning, World War II, combat veterans. Despite his obtaining graduate degrees, first in personnel and guidance and then in clinical psychology, he retained through his lifetime a keen interest in American history. My brother, Marino, a sophomore at Seton Hall, introduced me, a freshman, to Harold, a senior. I had not known Harold although we grew up in the same town and attended the public schools. Harold drove the Schweitzer family car to and from Seton Hall, and he graciously offered me a ride whenever our schedules matched. To day-hop to Seton Hall from Rahway using public transportation, a person followed one of two routes: Pennsylvania Railroad to Newark and two Public Service buses to the campus, or Public Service bus to Roselle, the Green Flyer bus to Newark and a Public Service bus to the campus. An automobile ride was most welcome—even if a person arrived several hours before his first class. On those automobile rides to and from Seton Hall, our friendship developed. Harold was active on campus, writing for the college newspaper and singing in the Glee Club. He assisted me in obtaining a staff position on the newspaper, but not even Harold could open the Glee Club to me. Harold sang well enough to be given solos. In that year, Seton Hall began its radio station, WSOU-FM, and Harold and I were among the first to get on the air, hosting briefly a talk-music show. An undergraduate thesis was the prerequisite for graduation in the social studies department, where all theses had to be approved by Fr. Brady, a stickler for historical fact and thesis format. Many a student had his graduation delayed a year or more while he attempted to satisfy the demanding department chair. It seemed to me that Harold got a late start on his thesis, but he remained unperturbed. He was a quick study. Somehow he managed to submit his thesis just ahead of the deadline, and even the super sleuthing of Fr. Brady was unable to unearth anything that would deter Harold’s graduation. He was graduated with honors. Harold wrote well, but he obtained more pleasure from the final product than from the process. He wrote only to meet requirements. I continued my studies; Harold went out in the business world. He was a salesman in a furniture store, The Treasure Trove. He did well, but he didn’t see the position as a career. He began to take courses toward teacher certification. For the next three years, we spent one evening a week, either in his parents’ home or mine, watching TV. Each of us connected with the other’s father very well; it was as though each household gained another son. It was my understanding that all the Schweitzer relatives lived at 848 Westfield Avenue: his parents, his paternal grandmother and another person who lived with them “because she had no other place to live.” Mine was a large extended family, and Harold frequently accompanied us to my relatives’ homes in nearby New York. When he didn’t, I always heard, “Where’s Harold?” Of course, double-dating was in the picture, Harold giving me fits because he seemed always to have a date whose given name began with the “J” sound—Jane, Gerry, Jean, Jo, Judy, Gina. I was ever so careful not to address Jane as Jean or Gerry as Gina, but more than once I felt tongue-tied. By the time that I was graduated from Seton Hall, Harold had completed his teacher certification courses. We eventually applied for positions in Rahway School System. We were overjoyed to learn that we both had been assigned to the seventh and eighth grades in the new Madison School. Following our appointments, Mr. Potts interviewed us together. Looking at Harold’s 6’4”frame, he said, “You’ll find it easy to establish discipline in your class. They key will be to hold the advantage your size gives you.” Then, looking at me, he said, “You’ll have your work cut out for you from the outset.” Mr. Potts saw us as individuals, but he also perceived that he had to contend with us almost as though we were a single entity. In retrospect, we gave him occasion to believe he was correct. For example, Harold and I were asked to participate in a Saturday formal occasion, requiring us to hire tuxedos. We conspired to wear them to Madison School the following Monday. We walked into the office to sign in, and there stood a wide-eyed, disbelieving principal. I said, “It is formal education week, you know.” We both walked out before he recovered to say anything. First-year teachers! Only a few of the students seemed to notice our strange wardrobes. In spite of our upstart, often zany approach, I think he liked us individually and together. He certainly liked that we maintained classroom control. He liked our going out at lunch time to play softball or football with the older children—even though he knew legally he was on dangerous ground. And, we liked him—admired him as a man and as an administrator. I don’t remember how the caricaturing of one another got started, but neither Harold nor I ever believed that the other would take it except as it was intended—a bit of fun. Each of us had served as the other’s best man. Fortunately, our wives got along well. We remained close even though our careers began to move in different directions. The country was gearing up for the centennial observance of the conflict between North and South, 1860-1865. Harold insisted that the proper name was “The War between the States,” and the principal issue was not slavery but states’ rights. He read voraciously, preferring the historian Clifford Dowdy to the equally popular and prolific Bruce Catton—Dowdy because he developed the Southern—the states’ rights—perspective more than Catton. Harold knew that the narrative style which both Dowdy and Catton used was influenced by another historian, Bernard DeVoto. Harold was intrigued by Quantril’s Raiders, a little know band of Confederate thugs who raised havoc with the Union forces and the Union lines. His principal hero was the flamboyant General George Custer. An original portrait of Custer in oils graced the Schweitzer living room. One of the family vacations was to the site of Custer’s Last Stand. Harold wanted to be a school psychologist. He had taken his master’s degree at Seton Hall under St. Theresa Gertrude, a pioneer in the personnel field. Then he went on to study for his doctorate in clinical psychology at Fordham University. He transferred from Madison School to Rahway High School for the opportunity to work in psychometrics, Rahway not yet having a special services team. He left the Rahway School system to assist Dr. Harold Sperber, Westfield School psychologist for two years. Sr. Theresa Gertrude was planning to retire. She remembered Harold from her classes and asked him to be her successor as head of the Department of Personnel & Guidance at Seton Hall. He was completing his doctorate. He accepted the position. His training had strong overtones of Freudian thinking, but even as he settled into the Seton Hall program, Harold’s focus shifted first to Harry Stack Sullivan and eventually to Carl Rogers. I always suspected that Harold’s fondness for Sullivan was as much for the manner in which he became known as for his theory of interpersonal behavior. Sullivan never wrote anything himself. After his premature demise, his students published posthumously their notes from his classes. Later, Harold called me to be an adjunct lecturer in the department, handling courses in elementary school guidance (then a new field) and group counseling. Much of my doctoral training had been in group psychology. There being a gap in group work in the Seton Hall master’s degree program, Harold asked me, then a principal in Franklin Township, to come to the university full time. I resigned, effective June, and prepared to join Harold again in the Seton Hall summer session. We looked forward to working side-by-side once more. In early January, 1965, during a heavy snow storm, we received a distressing telephone call from Harold’s wife that he had suddenly died, at age 37, while at the supper table with his family—wife, the former Regina Pounds of Clifton, two sons and his infant daughter. Harold had postponed surgery because the odds of his surviving the operation then were 50/50. He had hoped for better odds, but time clearly was not on his side. |
||
August 7, 2010 MEMORIES AND REMINISCENCES OF MR. SCHWEITZER - 09/56-06/57
He was tall - that I remember for sure. Very tall from the perspective of a seventh-grader coming from the genes of compact Steppe-riding and math-abiding people. We did well on the math part of SATs. Moreover, my older sister had told me that he was not only tall but a man to be respected. She told me that I was very fortunate to have him as a home room teacher. Her crush on him had abated as she advanced to eighth grade and further ego-ideals. Teachers back then were our ideals: bright, handsome or pretty, and sophisticates who would teach us the ways of the world. We must remember that this was before the time of potent CEO’s (we didn’t even have that title back then), sexualized rock stars, or deified politicians. “Truth was beauty and beauty was truth” - it was as simple as that. As best as we could, we were there to advance our abilities to think and to communicate the results of our efforts. Our professor, well over six feet tall, thought that this was an honorable task - who were we to dispute this.
Mr. Schweitzer was not alone. It is not possible to think of Mr. Schweitzer without thinking of Mr. Palisi. Notice the use of “Mister” for the both of them. They were equals, and we gave them equal respect. Each tended to joke about the other, so why didn’t we take sides? Despite the joking, it was clear that each respected the other, so taking sides was not what each wished. What was important beyond winning a silly performance battle was that each teacher seemed to respect the other’s efforts. In today’s times of academic scores, it’s difficult to conceive of two teachers working together on behalf of the education of their students. We were very fortunate that both Mr. Schweitzer and Mr. Palisi not only worked together on our behalf, but they presented us with the pleasures of their efforts. They not only coordinated their efforts to help us learn, but they allowed us to feel the pleasure of mutuality that they felt in their coordinated efforts.
Mr. Schweitzer was my “proto-professor”. Mr. Schweitzer wore a professorial tweed jacket and laid down his leather briefcase on his desk each day. This is my memory of the man who stimulated my sense of learning each day. He was not the man who was paid to advance us a grade in his subject, but he was a man who seemed to have an interest in the area of knowledge itself. I vividly remember when he spoke to us about the time when General Braddock met George Washington at the joining of the Monongahela and Allegheny Rivers (the Ohio River). Not only was the reason for it clear, but also the event was clear, even to this day. Without Mr. Schweitzer’s passion for history, I would have little interest in it either then or now. Without his passion, I would have very little interest or passion for history and the importance that it has now. Unfortunately, many of us have not developed a passion for or interest in history and, hence, are doomed to repeat it (George Santayana).
Mr. Schweitzer gave us confidence. Professor Schweitzer would come in each day and would unload his briefcase of books and papers. He would assign us questions and issues that we were to ponder at our seventh grade level. We did not have to worry about being called for daily assignments. He depended on us to prepare for tests and quarterly papers that were structured in the form of twenty questions. He depended on us to develop our ideas about important historical issues and Mr. Palisi to teach us to put our ideas on paper. He thought that we could think beyond the simple recognition of facts or identification of multiple choice answers. He thought that we could read, analyze, and write--even in seventh grade--and he encouraged and helped us in our efforts. Without scaring us, he had us write our first “papers”, a task that would become essential to us throughout college and beyond. And he would give us these assignments with a smile, knowing that Mr. Palisi would guide us with grammar and writing. I needed no further teaching until my RHS senior year when Mr. (Dr.) Casey’s ideas brought further stimulation although no change of structure. Mr. Schweitzer taught us well and gave me confidence throughout many years of writing.
Of great importance, Mr. Schweitzer was a decent guy and a great role model. Early each morning, I would stroll into his class for home room - whatever purpose that served. He would welcome us each day with a smile and a welcome that included the unique nickname that he gave us. Each day, he not only seemed pleased that we were there, but he seemed happy to be there. Teaching was his job, but he actually seemed to enjoy it, even early in the morning (I recollect that Mr. Palisi also always seemed to enjoy his work, although I had his class later in the day). Since it is the usual mindset and expectation of us students to perform well and excel in tests, degrees, money, and status, I was aware of the importance of satisfaction and pleasure in our efforts, whether scholarly or manual, until much later on. I’ve always enjoyed my work, but I’ve never thanked Mr. Schweitzer for this ability. It’s one matter to do the job and another matter to enjoy the work. He seem happy in class (strangely enough), and I was glad that I had Mr. Schweitzer for history in my last period because I always left school in a good mood ; he (and inevitably, Mr. Palisi) seemed to enjoy playing with us in recess (Mr. Schweitzer hit the highest fly balls that I’ve ever seen) and definitely enjoyed teaching.
Mr. Schweitzer was a great role model for me and, with his lightness and good humor, helped me enjoy the years of schooling and training that might have otherwise seemed a drudgery. Most importantly, he (I still can’t forget his constant companion, Mr. Palisi) served as a good and enjoyable model of a “decent guy”. I wish that his life had continued long enough for me to thank - so I’ll pass my regards along to his teaching twin, Mr. Palisi.
Bob Rostkowski entered Madison in 1953 in the fifth grade
|
||
Mr. Schweitzer is as vivid in my memory today, as though it was yesterday. I feel his method of teaching with the question and answer approach enabled us to learn and retain more than any way we were previously taught. It also helped with our composition and writing skills, as well as Social Studies.
It is difficult to think of him without picturing him and Mr. Palisi as a "tag team". They were the two best teachers in the Rahway School System and we were very fortunate to have been taught by them.
Mr. Schweitzer called Dorothy Stanch and me the "Bobsey Twins " because we sometimes dressed alike. He always wore a black watch plaid vest on test days and I can still picture him standing in front of the class taking his index finger and pushing up his glasses on the bridge of his nose.
Every now and then when I get up to Rahway and ride down Maple Ave., I think of him.
Ginny Pavelec Granata
Entered Madison in 1953 in the fifth grade
|
||
Mr. Schweitzer and Mr.Palisi were a special teaching team as well as best friends. Best friends I found out about years later. Mr. Schweitzer, being the height he was, didn't need to do much to command attention and respect from a little kid like myself from the get go. Add intelligence, humor and ability to handle kids and he was a winner. The way he and Mr. Palisi made school fun with their messages they had us pass from one to the other was such fun—plus we learned so much from both of them. I loved school because of them. It is hard to separate one teacher from the other. They were a team. Mr. Schweitzer was the kind of teacher a student feels honored and lucky to have at least once in her life and wishes she had more in her school years. His wife knows the good teacher he was, but now she will read from all the students that take the time to write and remember how significant her husband was for us. Also his children will know their Dad is remembered by many students for the wonderful teacher he was and for the humor he and his good friend Mr. Palisi brought to the classroom.
He is gone but he is not forgotten. I was his student over 50 years ago and his memory has been with me not just now but for all these many years.
Jerilyn Cook Jefferis
Entered Madison School in the sixth grade in 1953
****************************************** |
||
|
My brother called me last night and asked that I contribute my thoughts on Mr. Schweitzer for the Madison School web site and this brought back a flood of happy memories. Mr. Schweitzer and his compadre, Mr. Palisi, made each day fun and yet we learned to think analyze subject matter that is important to me more that 55 years later. Mr. Schweitzer (and later Miss Wise in American History I) made history my favorite subject. To this day I love to read historical biographies and especially books about our country's past and I owe this to Mr. Schweitzer. His love for his subject was contagious and one of my proudest moments was when he announced that I had earned an A+ for the marking period. If I remember correctly, "Questions and Answers" was our weekend assignment and I struggled to decipher my poorly scribbled notes so he'd write "good" across the page. The battle plans drawn on the blackboard and the recording of Civil War songs that he played for us made that period of our history as contemporary as the Cold War and Air Raid Practice. I can't hear "Aura Lea" and "Bonny Blue Flag" without thinking of Mr. Schweitzer. Ken Burns' "Civil War" would have pleased him so very much, and I watched that program thinking of Mr. Schweitzer.
In my mind's eye I can still see him perched on the desk lecturing, then jumping to his feet to draw something on the board to emphasize a point or make it clearer for our seventh grade minds. He was fair and funny, and it was a joy to be in his homeroom and Social Studies class.
Mary Jo Rostkowski
Entered sixth grade in 1953
****************************************** |
||
|
As a child in 7th grade, I had never known anyone a tall as Harold Schweitzer so my first impression was total awe at his height.
I found Mr. Schweitzer to be a tenderhearted but strong educator who instilled in us an ethic of workmanship for our study of American History. NO FOOLING AROUND in his class! He kept us desiring to learn more about our country, its foundation, and its founders. Mr. Schweitzer was serious about his classes and his teaching but could relax outside of class and play with us at lunchtime outdoors. Back in class it was "back to work".
I was very fond of Mr. Schweitzer and enjoyed his lessons on outlining which were very helpful as I went on through High School and college. He was a wonderful teacher who gave me a true love for American history.
As the kids say now....he was “AWESOME” in many ways. He will never be forgotten by his students from Madison Elementary School.
Grateful to have been a student of his,
Joyce Hudock Boos
Entered Madison in 1953 in the fifth grade
|
||
Remembering Mr. Harold Schweitzer Yes, he was tall, and yet to a sixth grader in 1954-55, that imposing stature was softened by a gentleness and calmness that made being in his class such a positive experience. Instead of being intimidating, Mr. Schweitzer was a supportive presence who, with his intelligent demeanor, made me ‘want’ to learn. If he thought it was important to learn history, to develop good note taking skills, to take education seriously, that was good enough reason for me to follow his advice and do the assignments he gave. There was something about him….a confidence, of the quiet type….and a self assurance that created an atmosphere in his classroom that everything was as it should be. For a young 11-year-old, coming to Madison each day was entering a place that made me feel as if there was no place else I wanted to be. Subconscious, of course….what 11-year-old sees this clearly.
One rarely analyzes an elementary school teacher: they simply ‘are’. In retrospect, however, Mr. Schweitzer had the air of an intellectual about him; and while it was a bit of surprise to learn that he had not only gotten a PHD, but was also a departmental chairperson at a Seton Hall, somehow it seemed a natural accomplishment, something he would and could do. It was obvious that the love for learning that he transmitted to a sixth grader also guided his career decisions.
And then, there was his relationship with his best bud, Mr. Palisi. For those of us who had them both as teachers, they almost seem to be inseparable in our minds. There was a gleeful, childlike side to these two men that they simply enjoyed sharing with us. Often, we would enter the classroom and be greeted with a cartoon on the chalkboard poking fun at some aspect of the teacher’s personality, intelligence, or anatomy. And we all knew it was the work of one of these two. The fact that these authority figures were really just masquerading as adults somehow didn’t escape our awareness. What I didn’t think about then was that this relationship was part of our education….Until then, and even later through high school and university, my vision of teacher was one with little sense of humor, serious and even stern demeanor, striving mightily to convince us, the students, that they were in charge and in control.
Yet, here were two that didn’t fit the mold. Where the others were distant, perhaps from a fundamental sense of insecurity about their authority, these two were so at home, so comfortable, and so confident in their roles that they could balance their positions as teachers/authority figures with their apparent need to just have a good time. The aplomb with which Mr. Schweitzer would regard the ‘insulting’ cartoon that Mr. Palisi had snuck in earlier to create, and the chuckle when he would erase it, implying he’d get even later was something we had never witnessed before in our education.
The message they were sending was clear: education is important, yes. Enjoying what you are doing, good natured teasing of colleagues/friends, and a great sense of humor could all coexist in the ‘work’ place. It was obvious that they enjoyed, even looked forward to coming to school to have fun working hard. It was a lesson that was delivered without a lecture, by example. Where other teachers would have been afraid to open up like this, these two teachers reveled in it. They also knew that their sharing these barbs drew us into their world, made us co-conspirators in a sense, and helped us see that academics and life were too serious to take seriously.
My memories of Mr. Schweitzer now move out the playground. At recess or lunch, we exited the back door onto the asphalt play area where some would match baseball cards, others would play tag, and yet others would throw a ball off the big back wall. It didn’t take long for Mr. Schweitzer to appear, ready to join in. Here was a 6’ 4” giant in the middle of five to ten kids almost half his size. I still remember his smile as he caught the ball and we jumped and grabbed to wrest it away. Once in a while he’d let us catch it. We loved it when he came out ‘to play’, and if he didn’t come out, the break would somehow be the less for it. He was like a favorite uncle who was always ready to ‘play’.
And then there were the days when we would break out the ball and bats and Mr. Schweitzer and Mr. Palisi would take turns seeing who could hit the ball the farthest. Both powerful hitters, it was clear that they competed good naturedly, just as we did, to see who could hit the long ball. To catch one of Mr. Schweitzer’s towering blasts was a rare and impressive feat. I don’t claim to have been one to do this, but Bob Rostkowski pulled one down one day.
And then, when recess or lunch was over, somehow….and I am still clueless as to how….when we entered the classroom, all excited and pumped up from our play, Mr. Schweitzer would calmly begin class as a teacher. And twenty or so kids would settle down and listen. The transition was so smooth, so natural, that there was rarely ever a need to ‘discipline’ a student. Where other teachers used empty threats, Mr. Schweitzer used the greatest trick of all: the fact that we cared what he thought of us. To disappoint him would have been unthinkable.
I’m so amazed when people tell me that they don’t even remember the names of their elementary school teachers….or even those in high school. Certainly, there are many that I don’t recall either. So, why is Mr. Schweitzer not only a fixture in my memory, but one that also carries with it such warm and vivid recollections? It’s not easy to figure that out, but then again, maybe it ‘is’ easy. He was ‘real’. He came across not only as a teacher whose job it was to help us learn but also as a person who had confidence in himself and in us. Instead of hiding behind the ‘authority’ façade, he projected his true personality: sincere, intelligent, fun-loving, and relaxed. Kids are masters at spotting the real teachers and the ones who are faking it. We all spotted Mr. Schweitzer from the start. He won our hearts and stimulated our minds.
That’s why so many of us who had him as our teacher remember him so vividly and so immediately when someone asks about our favorite teachers. Once a teacher wins students hearts, they remain there….and here we are, 55 years later….the memory is as clear and alive as if it was just last year.
Jim Cook
Entered Madison in 1953, fifth grade
|




